Marcus Hunt
~ Elite 1000 Member ~
Sam, I hope you don't mind me starting this thread regarding Master Classes and GMP in particular. You locked down the other thread before I could say anything (been running around delivering work and getting stuff prepped for the past 2 days) and there were a couple of interesting points which I'd like to add to if you'll allow it. I hope it doesn't get hijacked into the 'tool wars' thing.
Okay, firstly I hope you guys don't think I'm trying to teach you to suck eggs but some folks may not be aware of what a Master Class is and what it entails. Firstly, it 's not a teach-in as such. Everyone who applies to attend a Master Class and this applies to the Grand Masters Program (GMP) too, is selected by the 'Master' to attend his/her class. The people that apply are generally extremely competent in their field. With GMP the class isn't full of 'hack' engravers but experienced people who are specifically seeking to gain knowledge of certain or particular techniques. Perhaps they admire the Master's work and feel that they can quiz him about how he uses a particular method to get a certain result or sometimes they feel just by managing to spend some time with a particular Master is enough to further their insight.
Master Classes have been held in Europe for many years for musicians and artists and I dare say the same applies to the USA. To the engraving field though, it is a new thing. The rub off from Glendo/GRS starting the GMP is this forum. So even the lowliest novice is welcome here and can ask for opinions regarding tools and techniques which, even a few years ago, where hidden in a mysterious void. It is only by the engravers and supporters of engraving who attend the Grand Masters weekends and their willingness to share ideas and techniques that has led to this renaissance. Without the Grand Masters Program as a catalyst I doubt very much that Sam would have put so much effort and expense into this forum. Am I right Sam?
You'll find, if you are lucky enough ever to be invited to join such an event, that what tool is used to achieve a result is very low on the engraver's list of priorities. What generally happens is one engraver might show another something he's been working on and the first thing the observing engraver does is pull out his loupe and look into how the cuts interact with one another. The question as to whether he uses Air Graver or Graver Mach just doesn't arise. The results are what matter and that is what engravers are interested in. Of more interest is what graver was used and maybe geometries rather than what assisted the graver through the steel.
One of the most difficult things to do is mimic what another engraver does tool stroke for tool stroke and this is probably why Mike Dubber was saying that he and Marty where 'trying to keep up and not embarass themselves in front of their peers'. But really, in my opinion, that shouldn't be what it's about. It should be about absorbing knowledge and, hopefully, being able to put that knowledge of a technique to good use in the future.
Learning something new is always a challenge and I found myself in the same boat earlier in the year when I took Todd Daniels' stone setting class. It's totally different to what I normally do and I felt like a real duffer at times I can tell you! But it does one good to go back and be a complete beginner at something; indeed it's a quite humbling experience.
Just one last word on tools if I may. I have to agree with Andrew on this; bolting something onto a tool (be it Airtact or Palm Control) can only be seen as an upgrade if it improves things for a particular engraver. Some guys prefer the foot control, plain and simple so for them making their tools hand controllable isn't an upgrade because it doesn't improve their status quo as they see it. I assumed when I taught my English Scrolls class in June that everyone would be using Airtact as that's what I use. Wrong! The whole class used foot control and only one tried and liked Airtact (and in fact, it improved his work considerably). They liked their foot control because that is what they were used to and didn't see Airtact as an upgrade. Now for me, Airtact was a superb improvement and upgrade to my system because I've always hated the foot pedal. At the end of the day it's different strokes for different folks and remember, one man's meat is another man's poison!
Okay, firstly I hope you guys don't think I'm trying to teach you to suck eggs but some folks may not be aware of what a Master Class is and what it entails. Firstly, it 's not a teach-in as such. Everyone who applies to attend a Master Class and this applies to the Grand Masters Program (GMP) too, is selected by the 'Master' to attend his/her class. The people that apply are generally extremely competent in their field. With GMP the class isn't full of 'hack' engravers but experienced people who are specifically seeking to gain knowledge of certain or particular techniques. Perhaps they admire the Master's work and feel that they can quiz him about how he uses a particular method to get a certain result or sometimes they feel just by managing to spend some time with a particular Master is enough to further their insight.
Master Classes have been held in Europe for many years for musicians and artists and I dare say the same applies to the USA. To the engraving field though, it is a new thing. The rub off from Glendo/GRS starting the GMP is this forum. So even the lowliest novice is welcome here and can ask for opinions regarding tools and techniques which, even a few years ago, where hidden in a mysterious void. It is only by the engravers and supporters of engraving who attend the Grand Masters weekends and their willingness to share ideas and techniques that has led to this renaissance. Without the Grand Masters Program as a catalyst I doubt very much that Sam would have put so much effort and expense into this forum. Am I right Sam?
You'll find, if you are lucky enough ever to be invited to join such an event, that what tool is used to achieve a result is very low on the engraver's list of priorities. What generally happens is one engraver might show another something he's been working on and the first thing the observing engraver does is pull out his loupe and look into how the cuts interact with one another. The question as to whether he uses Air Graver or Graver Mach just doesn't arise. The results are what matter and that is what engravers are interested in. Of more interest is what graver was used and maybe geometries rather than what assisted the graver through the steel.
One of the most difficult things to do is mimic what another engraver does tool stroke for tool stroke and this is probably why Mike Dubber was saying that he and Marty where 'trying to keep up and not embarass themselves in front of their peers'. But really, in my opinion, that shouldn't be what it's about. It should be about absorbing knowledge and, hopefully, being able to put that knowledge of a technique to good use in the future.
Learning something new is always a challenge and I found myself in the same boat earlier in the year when I took Todd Daniels' stone setting class. It's totally different to what I normally do and I felt like a real duffer at times I can tell you! But it does one good to go back and be a complete beginner at something; indeed it's a quite humbling experience.
Just one last word on tools if I may. I have to agree with Andrew on this; bolting something onto a tool (be it Airtact or Palm Control) can only be seen as an upgrade if it improves things for a particular engraver. Some guys prefer the foot control, plain and simple so for them making their tools hand controllable isn't an upgrade because it doesn't improve their status quo as they see it. I assumed when I taught my English Scrolls class in June that everyone would be using Airtact as that's what I use. Wrong! The whole class used foot control and only one tried and liked Airtact (and in fact, it improved his work considerably). They liked their foot control because that is what they were used to and didn't see Airtact as an upgrade. Now for me, Airtact was a superb improvement and upgrade to my system because I've always hated the foot pedal. At the end of the day it's different strokes for different folks and remember, one man's meat is another man's poison!
Last edited: