Marcus Hunt
~ Elite 1000 Member ~
Weiland is a fair wordsmith, not as good as McIntosh was, and not the highly skilled technical mind of Vic Venters who can convey his thoughts into remarkable "wordsmithing".
I still blame McIntosh for forcing the word "frame" into the vocabulary of gunmaking terms. Strange how Weiland uses the word frame and locks in quote "After the locks and frame were finished and polished “in the white” by the actioner and lock-maker,". I had a go at McIntosh over this as there are no "frame makers" in English fine shotgun or double rifle making, only "actioners" but he likened a double gun to a pistol which has a frame which is wrong. Double guns aren't pistols. But being looked upon as some kind of guru, McIntosh's influence can now be seen amongst other writers. It seems crazy that mistakes in American English get carried through into the language almost as gospel. Both aluminium and googol were originally misspelled and have entered common parlance as aluminum and Google, but when it comes to renaming parts of shotguns and rifles one man's influence and ignorance should not be allowed to ride roughshod over centuries of history! That is just arrogance. :no:
These writers, although entertaining, should not necessarily be looked upon as experts in any particular field as one week they could be writing about guns, the next fishing and the next fine wines. Often they are paid by the word so the more flowery and poetic the language, the more words are used and the more they get paid. I have nothing against this per se but I often find this style very boring than something concisely written.
I agree with Weiland's comments about very fine bulino not wearing at all well. But we engravers know that bulino refers to the tool used and therefore there are various types of bulino. The very fine Italian stuff used to be known as "punto" when I was an apprentice, describing "point work". There are many forms of "bulino" which are very durable when case hardened. Ignorance or lack of research on the writers part?
Likewise, he says that many of the finely engraved guns never go into the field. I was taught to cut as if everything I did would go into the field. Indeed, much of the pressure I find myself under is because clients have safaris booked and want to take their new rifles with them. Just because the stuff we do is expensive doesn't mean that it goes into a collection. Often use gives a gun/rifle character and patina that a mint condition piece lacks. As my everyday watch I wear my Panerai Luminor Submersible; some people are horrified at this but in my eyes some of the nicest examples are the worn ones with scratched cases and beat up straps. It shows they had a life and the same can be said about an awful lot of fine English shotguns and rifles which are working tools, not museum pieces.
Last edited: