blacksmith_wills
Member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2011
- Messages
- 76
Hi folks,
I'm almost afraid to ask the question. I have been reviewing the various threads on hand versus fixture sharpening.
Wow, it's easy for you all to get off on a tangent. Ha!
If it makes you all feel any better after my last comment, any forum like this I have ever been on have these conversations.
Try asking a group of blacksmiths which is better, a new cast steel (not cast iron) anvil, or one of the old hand made wrought iron anvils? Boy will that fan the flames!
Relevant engraving question follows.
I have finally gotten a little cash to spend on a real sharpening fixture. I made one that worked but it's limited. It will put a nice point on a 90 degree graver though. I had a great time making it. I considered making a dual angle fixture but I think I would rather cut practice plates.
I have been looking at the two dual angle sharpeners that GRS sells. The one with the QC collet system and the more universal Dual Angle sharpener.
I have decided on a GRS system rather than the Lindsay templates for a very simple reason, GRS has been extremely helpful and generous when I have needed help with equipment or advice. JB is a great guy. I want to repay him for being so kind. I know Steve Lindsay is a great person as well, don't misunderstand me there.
I use the QC collets on the gravers I use, right now they are all 90 degree, 45 face, 15 degree heels. I would like to try some different graver geometries just to see how they work.
Is there any particular difference between the versatility of the two dual angle sharpeners GRS sells? Are they pretty much comparable accuracy wise?
Buying a fixture is all about buying accuracy I think.
The money is close enough I'm not going to put that in the equation.
I like the detent feature of the QC sharpener, any reason to choose the other Dual Angle sharpener over it?
And for you traditionalists out there, I know I should learn to hand sharpen. I also use a modern cast steel anvil!
Thank you!
Regards,
Matt
I'm almost afraid to ask the question. I have been reviewing the various threads on hand versus fixture sharpening.
Wow, it's easy for you all to get off on a tangent. Ha!
If it makes you all feel any better after my last comment, any forum like this I have ever been on have these conversations.
Try asking a group of blacksmiths which is better, a new cast steel (not cast iron) anvil, or one of the old hand made wrought iron anvils? Boy will that fan the flames!
Relevant engraving question follows.
I have finally gotten a little cash to spend on a real sharpening fixture. I made one that worked but it's limited. It will put a nice point on a 90 degree graver though. I had a great time making it. I considered making a dual angle fixture but I think I would rather cut practice plates.
I have been looking at the two dual angle sharpeners that GRS sells. The one with the QC collet system and the more universal Dual Angle sharpener.
I have decided on a GRS system rather than the Lindsay templates for a very simple reason, GRS has been extremely helpful and generous when I have needed help with equipment or advice. JB is a great guy. I want to repay him for being so kind. I know Steve Lindsay is a great person as well, don't misunderstand me there.
I use the QC collets on the gravers I use, right now they are all 90 degree, 45 face, 15 degree heels. I would like to try some different graver geometries just to see how they work.
Is there any particular difference between the versatility of the two dual angle sharpeners GRS sells? Are they pretty much comparable accuracy wise?
Buying a fixture is all about buying accuracy I think.
The money is close enough I'm not going to put that in the equation.
I like the detent feature of the QC sharpener, any reason to choose the other Dual Angle sharpener over it?
And for you traditionalists out there, I know I should learn to hand sharpen. I also use a modern cast steel anvil!
Thank you!
Regards,
Matt
Last edited: