Arnaud Van Tilburgh
~ Elite 1000 Member ~
First let me say I don't want to start a tool fight.
I started engraving with a Graversmith, 901 hand piece and the Powerhone using mostly the 120°, five months ago.
I have read almost every tip on the Alfano website, also about sharpening. At first I thought I could sharpen the engravers "the old way" using a Arkansas to polish the heel and face.
But As it was very hard to do and I spend more time on sharpening than cutting, I also bought the Powerone.
When I started using the Powerhone my cutting became better. I used the angles Sam illustrates on his website. But from the start I saw that the heel was not parallel with the face. I thought I was doing something wrong until I figured out that the heel couldn't be parallel to the face when using the same angles for the V and the heel.
I already knew about the Lindsay Point, but as English is a little hard sometimes to understand, especially technical terms, I could not find out what was so different.
A few days ago I did an effort trying to understand an finding out about the Lindsay point.
I resharpened a traditional 120° engraver I made from a blank 90° to a 115 Lindsay point.
Sure everyone thinks that his idea is the best, so I was sceptical reading the advantages Lindsay tells about this point.
But I must say that using the Lindsay point for two days now, I can't find out why I should not use the Lindsay point, because everything what is told about this way of sharpening seems to be true.
So I think that most of you master engravers are using these Lindsay angles or at least have tried them.
The advantage I figured out till now is that it is not necessary to hold the engraver like using a knife and fork, that the point stays better in the cutting object.
The cutting faces are bright, and most important seems to me, that cutting very thin shading lines are easier to do.
My question to you is: is there an advantage not to use the Lindsay point?
arnaud
I started engraving with a Graversmith, 901 hand piece and the Powerhone using mostly the 120°, five months ago.
I have read almost every tip on the Alfano website, also about sharpening. At first I thought I could sharpen the engravers "the old way" using a Arkansas to polish the heel and face.
But As it was very hard to do and I spend more time on sharpening than cutting, I also bought the Powerone.
When I started using the Powerhone my cutting became better. I used the angles Sam illustrates on his website. But from the start I saw that the heel was not parallel with the face. I thought I was doing something wrong until I figured out that the heel couldn't be parallel to the face when using the same angles for the V and the heel.
I already knew about the Lindsay Point, but as English is a little hard sometimes to understand, especially technical terms, I could not find out what was so different.
A few days ago I did an effort trying to understand an finding out about the Lindsay point.
I resharpened a traditional 120° engraver I made from a blank 90° to a 115 Lindsay point.
Sure everyone thinks that his idea is the best, so I was sceptical reading the advantages Lindsay tells about this point.
But I must say that using the Lindsay point for two days now, I can't find out why I should not use the Lindsay point, because everything what is told about this way of sharpening seems to be true.
So I think that most of you master engravers are using these Lindsay angles or at least have tried them.
The advantage I figured out till now is that it is not necessary to hold the engraver like using a knife and fork, that the point stays better in the cutting object.
The cutting faces are bright, and most important seems to me, that cutting very thin shading lines are easier to do.
My question to you is: is there an advantage not to use the Lindsay point?
arnaud