Thierry Duguet
Elite Cafe Member
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2007
- Messages
- 359
I think that we have to agree with the meaning of the word. In the old time being a master craftsman, met that you were able to accomplish every task related to your craft with a high degree of success. Being the best watch engraver in the world does not qualify one as a master if it is the only thing one can do. As a master engraver one should be able to create original work, should be proficient in the most common styles, from deep/high relief to game scene, from English scrolls to American scrolls, metal inlay and overlay, lettering. Of course very few people would be proficient to all this tasks, that is why they are the elite and should be call Masters.
I recognize that we can not be so stringent in or requirement, maybe modern "Master" would not have to be equally qualify in every aspect of the craft but they should be able to perform all of them with some degree of success.
I find absurd to compare a gifted musician to an engraver, should you need a comparison, use visual art, sculpting, painting, etc, how many five, ten, twenty years old are/were seen as masters in the visual art domains, not many, none that I can think about.
I do not think that a minimum given number of hours days or years is necessary or require to become a "Master", the title of is not the recognition of the time spend neither is it the recognition of the effort it is the reward of the result.
As I was saying when I started this post, words have meaning, if you do not like the meaning do not use the word or qualify it.
I recognize that we can not be so stringent in or requirement, maybe modern "Master" would not have to be equally qualify in every aspect of the craft but they should be able to perform all of them with some degree of success.
I find absurd to compare a gifted musician to an engraver, should you need a comparison, use visual art, sculpting, painting, etc, how many five, ten, twenty years old are/were seen as masters in the visual art domains, not many, none that I can think about.
I do not think that a minimum given number of hours days or years is necessary or require to become a "Master", the title of is not the recognition of the time spend neither is it the recognition of the effort it is the reward of the result.
As I was saying when I started this post, words have meaning, if you do not like the meaning do not use the word or qualify it.
Last edited: