Meiji EMZ 8TR trinocular scope

Ray Cover

~ Elite 1000 Member ~
Joined
Nov 14, 2006
Messages
1,012
Location
Missouri
Hey everyone,

I am thinking about getting one of the Meiji EMZ 8TR trinocular scopes for the school here. I have been using a camera off to the side to do demos with but I am thinking about getting a good trinocular scope to teach with.

The thing at appeals to me about the 8TR is that all three view ports (both eye ports and the camera port is open at all times) Before spending the cash on one I wanted to see if there was anyone out there who has actually used one and could give me a review pros and cons.

Also Does anyone know where to find a good used one and what a used one should cost. I found one for around $1,200. New they are around $1,500.
If its in super good shape the $1200 didn't sound too bad to me.

Any input will be appreciated.

Ray
 

Sam

Chief Administrator & Benevolent Dictator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Messages
10,491
Location
Covington, Louisiana
I had one and sold it. I think for $650. Good scope but the working distance is too much for me. It's about 1" or more greater than the standard EMZ-5 and I was stretching to see through the scope.

I never got as far as using the camera port.
 

Ray Cover

~ Elite 1000 Member ~
Joined
Nov 14, 2006
Messages
1,012
Location
Missouri
Thanks Sam,

I am guessing the work distance could be fixed with a .3 or .4 objective lens rather than a .5 objective. My main purpose is for a dedicated teaching scope not my everyday scope so that probably would not be as much of an issue for me anyway. Were the optics as clear as on the regular EMZ?

Ray
 

Sam

Chief Administrator & Benevolent Dictator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Messages
10,491
Location
Covington, Louisiana
As I recall the optics were fine. A different objective might be the solution. Ideally you should have the scope, different objectives, and camera hooked up so you could test the various configurations and find the sweet spot. Be prepared for the video output to be different than what you're seeing through the scope. Sometimes it's minimal and sometimes it's huge depending on the size of the sensor in the camera. I wish I knew more about how these variable work together. You might contact Edmund Optics. They probably know more about microscopes than anyone.
 

Sam

Chief Administrator & Benevolent Dictator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Messages
10,491
Location
Covington, Louisiana
One of the instructors at GRS cropped the eyepieces so he was seeing the same view as the class when using a Meiji EMZ-TR8. I think it might have been Marcus Hunt. FWIW, the cameras we used were 1/2" CCD cameras. If I'm not mistaken, a smaller sensor works like a smaller sensor in a DSLR, in that it has an effective greater magnification, and larger sensors have a wider view.
 

Ray Cover

~ Elite 1000 Member ~
Joined
Nov 14, 2006
Messages
1,012
Location
Missouri
Thank you Sam that is helpful info. Mine is a 1/3" and I get decent magnification but the issue I am having is this. Since my camera is slightly off to the side students are not seeing exactly the same angle that I am under the scope. There are times viewing shinny surfaces that I have glare on either the camera or the scope. In other words to move the object so they don't have a glare I do and vice versa. A film of modeling clay helps this but its a pain to do that all the time.
 

Sam

Chief Administrator & Benevolent Dictator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Messages
10,491
Location
Covington, Louisiana
I know what you mean, Ray. It's been an irritation we've had to tolerate for years with side mounted cameras. The GRS camera mount at least gets the camera as physically close to the scope as possible and shoots as directly down as possible, but it's still not a perfect setup. I've tested a lot of CCD cameras and the smaller sensor cameras don't have enough dynamic range to keep a shiny surface from completely burning out on the screen. Even some of the later generation digital models with large sensors do this, which is why I've always preferred the older analog CCD cameras with 1/2" sensor. It doesn't make sense at all. The digital cameras should outperform the old analogs, but many don't (I personally have never tested one that does). Blaine Lewis at New Approach School is using a digital CCD camera and getting good results with it, but it's HD and I believe VERY expensive.
 

mrthe

Moderator
Joined
Oct 20, 2010
Messages
1,787
Location
Spain
i had make some experiments , maybe not very professional, i have attached a logitech c-910 full hd webcam to one of the eyepiece on my double head NSK scope and the image is very very good,but like i have see maybe not a " professional" set-up, but work very well if i want show what i see in my scope mch more better than the conventional scope eyepiece cams that are selled for much more money but well i have the McGyver syndrome hehe
 

bersis

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Messages
5
Location
Nalchik
Im planing to get one meiji..im searching between the models these days..i think i will go for emz13..sometimes i feel like i need more magnification..it has 70x w/o aux..
 

Latest posts

Sponsors

Top